Monument Lefebvre
Classified Federal Heritage Building
Memramcook, New Brunswick
General view
(© Parks Canada Agency / Agency Parcs Canada.)
Address :
488 Central Street, Memramcook, New Brunswick
Recognition Statute:
Treasury Board Policy on Management of Real Property
Designation Date:
1984-03-09
Dates:
-
1896 to 1897
(Construction)
Event, Person, Organization:
-
James C. Dumaresq
(Architect)
-
Sylvain Gaudet
(Builder)
Custodian:
Parks Canada
FHBRO Report Reference:
83-81
DFRP Number:
42097 00
Description of Historic Place
The Monument Lefebvre is a large cube-like building with a balanced composition. Constructed of rough-faced stone in an eclectic, late 19th-century manner, it has a monumental front façade accessed by a flight of stone steps. The building’s visual significance is enhanced by its siting on the crest of a hill overlooking the grounds of the former campus of the Memramcook Institute in St. Joseph, New Brunswick. The building contains an auditorium on its upper floor. The designation is confined to the footprint of the building.
Heritage Value
The Monument Lefebvre is a Classified Federal Heritage Building because of its historical associations, and its architectural and environmental values.
Historic Value
The heritage value of Monument Lefebvre lies primarily in its important historical associations and in the integration of siting, exterior design, and interior layout. The building was constructed as a memorial to Father Camille Lefebvre, who founded the Saint Joseph’s College in Memramcook in 1864. At the time, Monument Lefebvre was the only institution of higher learning available to the Acadians. The building has become a symbol of Father Lefebvre's contribution to the rebirth of Acadian culture.
Architectural Value
Monument Lefebvre is valued for its very good aesthetic and functional design. It represents an eclectic building designed as a memorial in the late 19th-century, and thus its historical associations are consciously expressed in its architecture and sitting. The building was built according to plans prepared by James C. Dumaresq, who designed numerous commercial and institutional buildings throughout the Atlantic provinces. The architect used an eclectic stylistic vocabulary to provide both a range of functional spaces and a sense of memorial. Its symbolic role is reinforced by the detailing of the principal façade, a symmetrical arrangement featuring a central projecting pavilion, carefully articulated window and door openings, and flanking towers.
Environmental Value
Monument Lefebvre is compatible with the present character of its academic environment at the Memramcook Institute campus in St. Joseph, New Brunswick. The building's location on the crest of a hill with an unobstructed view over the valley below is important in establishing its symbolic role.
Sources: Marc De Caraffe, Monument Lefebvre National Historic Site, Memramcook, New Brunswick, Federal Heritage Building Review Office Building Report 83-081; Monument Lefebvre National Historic Site, Ottawa, Ontario, Heritage Character Statement, 83-081.
Character-Defining Elements
The following character-defining elements of the Monument Lefebvre should be respected.
Its very good aesthetic and functional design, and its good craftsmanship, for example: the detailing of the monumental principal façade, a symmetrical arrangement featuring a central projecting pavilion, carefully articulated window and door openings, and flanking towers; the ceremonial aspect of the building interior, where the main entrance opens into a central corridor leading to a stained glass commemorative window; the upper floor, which houses a large auditorium in the style of many town halls of the period; finishes and decorative features on the exterior and in the interior circulation routes and public spaces which are of above-average quality, in keeping with the building's ceremonial role.
The manner in which the Monument Lefebvre is compatible with the present character of its academic setting at the Memramcook Institute and its symbolic role as evidenced by: the integration of siting, exterior design, and interior layout which testify to the symbolic role of the building as a monument; the building's location on the crest of a hill with an unobstructed view over the valley below.
Heritage Character Statement
Disclaimer -
The heritage character statement was developed by FHBRO to explain the reasons for the designation of a federal heritage building and what it is about the building that makes it significant (the heritage character). It is a key reference document for anyone involved in planning interventions to federal heritage buildings and is used by FHBRO in their review of interventions.
HERITAGE CHARACTER STATEMENT
Monument Lefebvre
St. Joseph, New Brunswick
The Monument Lefebvre, at the Memramcook Institute in St. Joseph, New Brunswick, was built in 1896-97 by Sylvain Gaudet to the designs of James C. Dumaresq, architect. It is currently the property of the Memramcook Institute, and is slated for acquisition by PWC. See FHBRO Building Report 83-81.
Reason for Designation
On February 27, 1984, the Monument Lefebvre was designated Classified, primarily because of its important historical associations, consciously expressed in its architecture and siting.
The building was constructed as a memorial to Father Camille Lefebvre, who founded the College Saint-Joseph de Memramcook in 1864. It was, at the time, the only institution of higher learning available to the Acadians, who, because of it, were better able to maintain their traditions and ensure their cultural survival. That fact was recognized to be of national historic significance by the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada and the site was plaqued in 1978. The building has become a symbol of Father Lefebvre's contribution to the rebirth of Acadian culture.
James C. Dumaresq was one of a family of noted architects based in Halifax, and designed numerous commercial and institutional buildings throughout the Atlantic provinces.
Character Defining Elements
The heritage character of the property is defined by the integration of siting, exterior design, and interior layout. The architect has used an eclectic stylistic vocabulary to provide both a range of functional spaces and a sense of memorial.
The building's location on the crest of a hill with an unobstructed view over the valley below is important in establishing its symbolic role. This is reinforced by the detailing of the principal façade, a symmetrical arrangement featuring a central projecting pavilion, carefully articulated window and door openings, and flanking towers. The other façades are relatively simple and unadorned.
The ceremonial aspect of the building continues in the interior, where the main entrance opens into a central corridor leading to a stained glass commemorative window. The other spaces are arranged symmetrically about this central corridor.
The upper floor houses a large auditorium, in the style of many town halls of the period. The patterns of access and the orientation of the space are independent of the ground floor layout, but the function itself, as a place of public assembly, is important in the context of the building's symbolic role.
Finishes and decorative features on the exterior and in the interior circulation routes and public spaces are of above-average quality, in keeping with the building's ceremonial role.
It is important that those aspects of the design which reflect the unique cultural dimension of the property be protected and enhanced. These include the siting and balance of the composition, with its emphasis on the monumental front façade; the symmetry and ceremonial aspect of the ground floor layout; and the public assembly function of the second floor auditorium. The finishes and decorative features in these areas should be carefully maintained and restored where appropriate, to assure that the original architectural intent is preserved.
Outdoor circulation patterns around the building, paving materials and the planting scheme should reflect their historic precedent. The temptation to introduce modern landscape design methods should be resisted.
For further guidance, please refer to the FHBRO Code of Practice.
1987.04.10
(5975)