Sewell House
Recognized Federal Heritage Building
Québec, Quebec
Rear view
© Parks Canada Agency / Agence Parcs Canada, 1969.
Address :
87 St. Louis Street, Québec, Quebec
Recognition Statute:
Treasury Board Policy on Management of Real Property
Designation Date:
1988-07-21
Dates:
-
1803 to 1804
(Construction)
Event, Person, Organization:
-
Jonathan Sewell
(Architect)
Other Name(s):
-
Office Keeper's Quarters
(Other Name)
-
Building 1
(Other Name)
Custodian:
National Defence
FHBRO Report Reference:
87-112
DFRP Number:
56508 00
Description of Historic Place
Sewell House is located in Upper Town Québec next to the citadel in the city of Québec’s historic district. The two-and-a-half-storey square-shaped building has a gable roof and symmetrical five-bay façade. The central entrance is reached by a double flight of stairs while notable features include multi-pane windows, a stringcourse, and basement windows in every bay. The walls are of dressed stone, with simple limestone window and door surrounds. The designation is confined to the footprint of the building.
Heritage Value
Sewell House is a Recognized Federal Heritage Building because of its historical associations, and its architectural and environmental values.
Historical Value
Sewell House is a very good example of the early 19th-century development in Upper Town Québec under the British Regime. The house stands as an example of the settlement of the administrative and wealthier classes during the growth and development of Upper Town. The house was constructed for former Chief Justice Jonathan Sewell, (1766-1839), who was Solicitor General and Attorney General of Lower Canada before becoming a member of the Provincial Legislature in 1796. He is remembered chiefly for his alliance with, and influence on, the unpopular governor, Sir James Craig. As the military presence in the area expanded, the house was used as a post office, officer’s quarters, Government House, and a duplex for officers’ families and is currently part of the Québec Garrison Club National Historic Site of Canada.
Architectural Value
Sewell House is a very good example of British Classicism with its simple geometry and careful proportions. The balanced proportions of the sober façade are characteristic of the period. Good functional design is noted in the adaptability of the space over time. Very good craftsmanship and materials are evidenced in the masonry.
Environmental value
Sewell House reinforces the present historic character of its residential setting in the city of Québec’s historic district, and is a local landmark.
Sources: Paul Trépanier, La Maison Sewell, 87 rue Louis, Quebec, Quebec, Federal Heritage Buildings Review Office, Report 87-112c; Sewell House (Office Keeper’s Quarters), Quebec, Heritage Character Statement 87-112c.
Character-Defining Elements
The character-defining elements of Sewell House should be respected.
Its very good aesthetics, functional design, and very good craftsmanship, for example: the two-and-a-half-storey massing, with a low-pitched gabled roof with three dormers; the front façade with its symmetrical, five-bay design, and central entrance; the regularly placed doors and multi-paned windows; the stone construction of regularly coursed dressed stone; the rectangular, two-light transom design above the principal entrance; the simple limestone window and door surrounds, and the boxed and trimmed cornice; a rear two-storey addition with verandahs; the interior configuration, and remaining original interior finishes; the basement windows at each bay, the larger central basement window sheltered by the covered arch under the double flight of stairs leading to the front door landing.
The manner in which Sewell House reinforces heritage character of its streetscape setting and is a local landmark, as evidenced by: its scale, design and materials, which complement the related adjacent structures; its visibility and familiarity within the local area due to its prominent location in the city of Québec.
Heritage Character Statement
Disclaimer -
The heritage character statement was developed by FHBRO to explain the reasons for the designation of a federal heritage building and what it is about the building that makes it significant (the heritage character). It is a key reference document for anyone involved in planning interventions to federal heritage buildings and is used by FHBRO in their review of interventions.
The Sewell House, exemplifying early 19th-century development in Upper Town Québec, was built in 1803-04 by former Chief Justice Jonathan Sewell. Sewell himself was probably involved in the design. The original estate was encroached on over the years by the expanding military presence in the area, and the house itself variously used as a post office, officers' quarters, Government House, and a duplex for officers' families. The Department of National Defence is the present custodian, and the house is considered part of the Garrison Club complex. See FHBRO Building Report 87-112.
Reasons for Designation
The Sewell House has been designated Recognized because of its architectural presence, its associations with Chief Justice Jonathan Sewell and the development of Upper Town in the early 19th century.
Architecturally, the estate initially comprised a central building with two matching side pavilions, set in impressive grounds facing the esplanade, with the citadel behind them. The central building survives, and retains its basic form and detailing as a good example of British classicism. One of the hip-roofed side pavilions also survives, but has been incorporated into the east entrance of the adjacent Garrison Club.
Historically, the house is directly associated with its original owner, Jonathan Sewell (1766-1839). A lawyer by training, Mr. Sewell was appointed Solicitor General and Attorney General of Lower Canada before becoming a member of the Provincial Legislature in 1796. He married the daughter of William Smith, a former Chief Justice of Lower Canada, and in 1808 followed in his father-in-law's footsteps by becoming a Chief Justice and Chairman of the Executive Council. He is remembered chiefly for his alliance with, and influence on, the unpopular governor Sir James Craig.
The Sewell House also stands as an example of the administrative and monied class settlement of Upper Town, during the period of rapid population growth in Québec and the intense development of Upper Town under the British Regime.
Both the Sewell House and Chief Justice Jonathan Sewell have been recognized by the Historic Sites and Monuments Board as being of national significance.
Character Defining Elements
The heritage character of the Sewell House is defined by its exterior, particularly the St. Louis Street façade.
The building is a two-and-a-half-storey, gable-roofed structure approximately 50 feet square. The front façade is a carefully proportioned, symmetrical, five-bay design, with central entrance originally marked by a semi-circular transom. The walls are of regular
coursed dressed stone, with simple limestone window and door surrounds. The elevated first storey is demarcated by a slightly projecting string course. The basement has windows at each bay. The central basement window, more vertical than horizontal, is sheltered by the covered arch formed by the double flight of stairs leading to the front door landing. The window sash, originally double hung - nine over six - and later casement, are now single units of six panes. The present entrance door transom is of rectangular two-light design.
There is a boxed and trimmed cornice, and three wood dormers in the low-pitched gable roof. The dormers are symmetrically placed above the three central bays; their gable-roofed form may be a modification of an original hip-roofed design.
This façade, although modified, retains the carefully proportioned balance characteristic of the period, and should be carefully preserved. The masonry work, in particular, requires regular maintenance and periodic restoration by qualified conservators. Many of the wood elements have been modified over the years, but they should be preserved, and changed only if historical research provides a more appropriate and well-documented form and detailing.
The side and rear elevations have been modified more extensively. The right gable end has been stuccoed, the left gable end clapboarded, and in both cases the pattern of openings apparently changed. A two-storey addition with verandahs on the rear creates an ell-shaped plan. Again, these elements and finishes should be preserved unless there is sufficient and accurate documentation on which to base restoration of an earlier appearance. In any case, the basic form of the original house, which has survived basically intact, should be maintained. No further additions should be contemplated as these would obscure the simple geometry and careful proportions of the original.
The interior of the building has undergone several alterations and changes in use, often showing little sensitivity to the original character of the building. Although much has been lost, future work should include architectural investigation and documentation of surviving historic fabric and any evidence of the building's evolution.
The present site does not provide a sense of the original setting of the house. However, all traces of earlier landscape treatment should be carefully documented and retained, and used as a basis for any development of the landscape treatment. It is important that the landscape reinforce the heritage character of the house.